The basic functions Computer 2: Macbook Pro, running Catalina. The 2011 MacBook Pros are the first laptops we've reviewed at CNET with these processors the entry-level 13-inch model features a second-generation 2.3GHz Core i5 processor, whereas the $1,499 configuration has a 2.7GHz dual-core Core i7.A. That upgrade comes in the form of next-generation Intel Core i-series CPUs. This year's 13-inch Pro gets a cutting-edge processor upgrade that many were waiting for-including us. This battery is tested before shipment and backed by full ONE year warranty and 30 day satisfaction money back guarantee against defects in material or workmanship.In short: unequivocally yes. This Brand New Apple MacBook Pro 13-inch Late 2011 Replacement Battery uses premium quality battery cells that provide higher performance, reliability, and longer life.In our benchmark tests, the Core i5 13-inch model performed so closely to the Core i7 version (and, in single-task tests, not that far off from the quad-core 15-inch Pro) that, for the $300 savings, it's arguably the better buy. Memory upgrades for the late 2011 Nupower 85W Replacement Battery For 15 Macbook Pro Early 2011-MID 2012 - Black R2 386.00 View Offer NewerTech 95W Replacement Battery For 15 Mackbook.Though both configurations use differently branded CPUs, the Core i5/Core i7 difference turns out to be pretty insignificant between these two 13-inch Pros. This particular model is the 'option' model (2.8GHz MacBook Pro MD314LL/A) meaning it came with the Core i7 and a 750gb hard drive.
Where To Buy Battery For 2011 Book Pro Upgrade Comes InThe iconic design and unibody construction has remained intact, even identical, to last year's 2010 model, even down to the port layout. Walk up to the 2011 version and you'd have no idea that you were looking at a "new" Mac. To be honest, we'd rather have a longer-lasting battery.There's nothing different design-wise about the new MacBook Pro. And though its integrated Intel graphics are a bit less capable than the previous model's Nvidia 320M GPU, the payoff comes with a sizeable jump in battery life. To put it in perspective, the 13-inch MacBook Pro is about as powerful CPU-wise as last year's $2,199 15-inch Core i7 model. The 13-inch Pro is compact and thin, but compared to wafer-thin Apple products like the iPad and MacBook Air, it ends up feeling heavier. Construction quality is, as always, rock-solid: compared with other flexy laptops, the seamless metal body of the Pro feels like modern art.That being said, we wouldn't mind some design improvements in the future, especially when it comes to thickness and weight. A wide expanse of aluminum and Apple's simple but excellently constructed keyboard feel like tech minimalism in a world of overwrought and overdesigned laptops, and the large multitouch clickpad is still-even nearly three years later-one of the largest we've seen. The slot-loading drive lines the right side. Even more oddly, the 13-inch MacBook Air actually has a higher resolution than the current 13-inch Pros, at 1,400x900 pixels.Speaker volume is adequate, and both music and movies sound good on the integrated stereo speakers. Oddly, the MacBook Pro might be the last laptop that hasn't switched to a 16:9 1,366x768-pixel display. The display has excellent brightness, color, and contrast, and the screen's viewing angles are generous, but the 1,280x800 native pixel resolution is identical to the 2010 model's. The ergonomics work excellently, and the MacBook Pro also has some of the largest, deepest palm-rest zones in a 13-incher.Edge-to-edge glass still frames the Pro's 13.3-inch screen, and, yes, there still isn't a matte screen option-although on the larger 15-inch line, antiglare is offered. It's useful for typing in low-light conditions, and the ambient light sensors control screen brightness and keyboard lighting in perfect balance. It's backward-compatible with old Mini DisplayPort monitors or cables, and like with last year's Pros, it can output audio and video over HDMI with a Mini DisplayPort-to-HDMI adapter.Thunderbolt may be a rival to USB 3.0, but devices that can use the port won't even be available until spring. The tiny Thunderbolt port is powered, and will be able to daisy chain up to six connected devices, be they hard drives or even monitors. The Intel-developed data and audio/video port has extremely fast throughput at a maximum of 10Gbps, and compatible hard drives will be able to send files with blazing speeds. More importantly, the Mini-DisplayPort has subtly been transformed into the aforementioned Thunderbolt port. Consider it future tech on your MacBook Pro-a perk, rather than a necessity.Apple's laptops have always had limited upgrade and configuration options the new Pros are no different. In two years, however, it could be indispensable. Is it necessary right now? No. Still, it's comforting to know that future port support is there. Either way, that comes to less than the high-end model's sticker price. If you're dying for more hard-drive space, consider a custom order on Apple's Web site: that hard drive can be expanded up to a 500GB hard drive for just $50, or 750GB for $150. The only real differences between the two models are their CPUs and included hard drives (320GB in our $1,199 configuration, 500GB in the $1,499 model). Start-up boot time is also zippy, although nowhere near as fast as on the MacBook Air. Benchmark tests show that this model is nearly twice as fast in multitasking and the iTunes test. It's an odd disconnect: even the 13-inch MacBook Air has a higher-resolution screen, and the lack of higher-end graphics feels cheap for such an expensive laptop.The new second-generation Sandy Bridge Intel Core i5 CPU is a huge improvement on last year's 13-inch Pro. There's no option to add discrete graphics, either. The 1,280x800-pixel glossy screen can't be upgraded, unlike on the 15-inch Pro. Those aren't cheap: the 128GB upgrade costs $250, whereas the 512GB costs a whopping $1,250.That's it as far as configurations go. Which text editor to use for bash in macInstead of the Nvidia GeForce 320M graphics in last year's Pro, this year's models use integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000, part of the second-generation Core i-series' improvements. Photoshop test scores slowed from 68 to 78 seconds, and iTunes from 92 to 99 seconds, but these results still leave most other last-generation Core i-series laptops in the dust.If there's one compromise on this year's 13-inch MacBook Pro, it's in the graphics. Even more surprisingly, the entry-level 13-inch Core i5 CPU wasn't all that much slower than the more expensive Core i7 13-incher we reviewed. While you should obviously keep in mind that the 15-inch Pro is even faster, for the price and the size, it's hard to beat what the 13-inch offers. We played Call of Duty 4 and got a reasonable 31.7fps at native resolution and anti-aliasing turned off, but only 17.8fps with 4x anti-aliasing turned on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorSampson ArchivesCategories |